![]() |
Delta-T in the pavement. |
The two major reasons for not having the house renovated are drinking, and cost. First I would like to discredit the drinking problem. Drinking tends to become part of college for many students. Some may worry that another house on Greek row that is lived in might add to the number of drinking students. In fact studies will show that members of Greek organizations will drink more often and heavier than non-Greek related students. (Mark et al 187) At our Louisville chapter this will not be a problem since our Greek Row is dry. Triangles want to live in their house, not lose it for good.
Second and more importantly is the cost. The cost of the renovation is affected by two main variables. One being all that has to be done to make the house considered “livable” by the university, the other is what must be done while completing the renovation to preserve the historic status of the house. The university mostly wants a sprinkler system installed, however a lot of the wood in the house is old and rotting and would need to be replaced to support such a system. Both of these items will be quite costly. Since the house is considered historic the cost is raised since special materials and labor techniques will have to be used. (Al-Nammari, Fatima, and Lindell 472) There is nothing that can be said to make this part of the problem go away. The cost will be the cost. However, I can say that from seeing how organized we are to how organized another chapter I have visited that do live together, it would easier to raise money to pay back the cost rather than raise the money for the cost. It is easier to find ways to not attend fund raisers and other Triangle events when you aren’t coming home to the base of operations for them.
![]() |
Broken window at the house, one of the many things that needs repair. |
It would most likely be found that after having the Triangle house renovated and the members move in that the amount of community service projects and turnout for them would increase. This would be because currently some Louisville chapter Triangles think that the house should be the target of a community service project and would be more willing to help others after seeing that someone out there in the world cared about them. Also common sense would dictate that it would be easier to organize a group of people when they are living under the same roof and not having to call 50 plus members to remind them all of the event. Not to mention the positive peer pressure that can be applied by roommates that can call the “I’m too sick” bluff along with other excuses.
Health would be another good reason to bring many brothers into a house that must follow campus health and safety codes from off-campus housing. One survey found that 39.6% of off-campus housing for college students came with visible mold. ("Environmental Health Risks Associated with Off-Campus Student-Tenant Housing.") This along with other health issues also listed in the survey caused varying degrees of sickliness that kept students from attending classes. ("Environmental Health Risks Associated with Off-Campus Student-Tenant Housing.") By living on campus the university would make sure that such health hazards didn’t exist, which would be better than the alternative even if it comes at the occupants expense.
![]() |
Triangle code of ethics. Number 5 in particular . |
Al-Nammari, Fatima M., and Michael K. Lindell. "Earthquake recovery of historic buildings: exploring cost and time needs."Disasters 33.3 (2009): 457-481. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 July 2011.
Bandy, Allyson. "CONSUMERS in the Know." Women in Business 57.2 (2005): 18-19. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 July 2011.
Johnson, Erin, Eugene C. Cole, and Ray Merrill. "Environmental Health Risks Associated with Off-Campus Student-Tenant Housing." Journal of Environmental Health 71.6 (2009): 43-47. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 July 2011.
Mark D. Wood, et al. "Fraternity and Sorority Leaders and Members: A Comparison of Alcohol Use, Attitudes, and Policy Awareness." American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse 36.4 (2010): 187-193. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 July 2011.
Sharon Shegog, et al. "Liking, Cooperation, and Satisfaction between Roommates." Journal of College & University Student Housing 34.2 (2007): 53-60. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 July 2011.